LITERARY INFLUENCES OF IT'S ALWAYS 9/11

Basically, I wrote this book as I usually write, from my gut, fact-checking where needed. However, there are books that did influence me subliminally.

Growing up, I was fascinated by dystopian classics from an early age. In seventh grade, I read George Orwell’s Animal Farm twelve times (one for each year of my life, I guess). The phrase “all pigs are equal but some are more equal than others” still resonates with me, as does the uncomfortable realization that class division is an inherent flaw of the human race, present throughout history, one of the reasons why utopias of all ideological stripes are doomed to fail. Then there was Orwell’s other classic, 1984. When that futuristic (now over thirty years old) date arrived, 1984 seemed rather overwrought. Sure, Ronald Reagan may have been President, but we still lived in a relatively free and open society with plenty of opportunity for free speech. Guess we just had wait another twenty-five years! The main nugget that stands out to me from 1984 is the ending, where the protagonist, Winston Smith is brainwashed to believe that “2 plus 2 is 5”. Seems like we are told to believe plenty of “alternative facts” such as this these days, and if they’re repeated often enough seemingly intelligent will believe them. It takes an effort of will to trust your own perceptions and do your own addition (or analysis).

Aldous Huxley’s writing style in Brave New World hasn’t stood the test of time. I re-read it a decade ago and found his wording tedious and dated, but his dystopian vision of a technocratic dictatorship gains relevance with each passing day. The use (misuse) of genetic manipulation as well as the sedation of the public with a tranquilizing drug (could be literal, or the mind-numbing hum of technological devices) ring disturbingly true.

The other topic that’s fascinated me—more as an adult—is the rise of totalitarian states. Not the finished product, but how they came to be. The most graphic representation of this in recent history, is, of course, the rise of Nazi Germany. I’m not particularly interested in World War Two from a battle standpoint, but how an intelligent, cultured society became enraptured by the evil cult of Nazism, now that interests me, and especially when it’s presented from the German point of view. That way we’re not looking outward at an enemy. We’re seeing how the enemy could be us. How it could happen here. Of particular interest is the journalist Joachim Fest’s “Not I”. Fest was a teenager during WWII and his father a liberal Catholic schoolmaster. The Fest family took risks to speak out against the Nazi regime , refusing to say “Heil Hitler” instead of “Hello” to people they met on the street (yes, that was a legal requirement!), keeping their children out of Hitler Youth until they were forcibly conscripted, hiding Jewish friend’s possessions, etc. And they suffered for it—Fest’s father lost his job, they lost their money, their home, their standing in the community. But they were never sent to a concentration camp, nor did they take the kind of risks that would lead to that kind of danger. The book contains an annoying measure of excuses and self justification of the “we didn’t know what was happening, we had to protect the children” variety but that in itself is part of the fascination of the book. How many people who consider themselves liberals in this country would really put their lives on the line to protect those who bear the brunt of an unjust government?

Fest also wrote another book, The Faces of the Third Reich, which sounds depressing and tedious but is well worth reading. In it, he analyzes the personalities of Hitler’s inner circle, and they are by no means a uniform group or cartoon villains. Some are gay, some are vegetarian, some fascinated with order, some fascinated by power, all of them drawn to Fascism by a complicated psychological/political chemistry.

The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt is another classic that sounds more tedious than it really is. Arendt’s analysis of totalitarianism is brilliant. My biggest takeaway from this lengthy book? The idea that a society terrorized by secret police is not a totalitarian society but one in the making. The sign of true totalitarianism is when those police are no longer necessary, when citizens police themselves. Another book that serves as an excellent corollary to Arendt’s is Erich Fromm’s Escape from Freedom, a psychological analysis of why people are scared of freedom, and rush into the claustrophobic safety of external structure, rules and order.

Lastly, The Garden of the Finzi-Continis, by Giorgio Bassani, is a haunting fictional exploration of a wealthy, insular Jewish family in Northern Italy who believe that their wealth will protect them from the Nazi aggression literally outside their walls…until it doesn’t. Bassini’s novella is also a superb movie.

Judge people not by the color of their opinions, but the content of their character

Sorry to paraphrase Martin Luther King, but I am so tired of the polarization of our political and social culture and how complex values and opinions are minimized into “package deals”. “Red” and “Blue”? Let’s save these simplistic designations for soccer games. In any conflict—violent or nonviolent—there are always two sides (or more); members of each group believing deeply in the inherent correctness of their views. At worst the opposing side is vilified (maybe even shot at); at best they’re treated with condescension, in the hope that they’ll come around and see the light. But all involved are human beings, all sharing the same basic human desires and experiences. It doesn’t stand to reason that one side is absolutely right, and the other absolutely wrong.

In “It’s Always 9/11” I give both “left” and “right” wing characters depth and validity. This comes from a very deep place where my mind feels absolutely cracked open. While writing, I was particularly influenced by a cross country trip my husband, teenage son, and I took in 2018, driving him from our home in liberal Portland, Oregon to college on the East Coast. We spent 10 days driving the Northern Route, (Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ontario, Upstate New York, Massachusetts) then returning by driving to Chicago and following Route 66 through New Mexico, then north through Colorado, Utah, and Idaho. The following year, inspired, we toured obscure areas of Georgia and the Florida Panhandle. On all these adventures, we met many people, the vast majority of whom were open, friendly, kind and curious, even though (or maybe because) we were clearly not local. Politics rarely came up; children, music, favorite hiking trails, often did. While researching my novel, I read lots of sites that no doubt confused my algorithm, but gave much insight into the thinking patterns of those who wrote and read them. Last but not least, the past couple of years have given me a huge appreciation for personal freedom, how it can be taken away, how it must be defended.

Are there enemies in “It’s Always 9/11”? Yes. But they do not divide along ideological lines. The enemies are the people who blindly accept conventional wisdom as it’s been curated for them by the news sources they read and as it resonates through the echo chamber of other people in their cultural/demographic silo. People who don’t question. Who don’t explore. Who simply assume.

Where's the sequel?

Many people ask me when the sequel is coming out for “It’s Always 9/11”. It’s the most common question I get. I hesitate to tell them my answer, which is “never”. The book ends where it began, on the Lost Coast, leaving Tessa at a pivotal moment where her life is about to change forever. I as a writer and you as a reader have accompanied her on the journey to that point. We are all free to speculate where the story goes from there, and I certainly hope that my readers do.

Trilogies are all the rage. Maybe it’s something about the number three; more likely people want answers. They want resolution. Sometimes a trilogy is an effective way of dealing with a very long and complex story that’s too overwhelming for one reasonable-length novel to hold. But more often they are an excuse for boring, bloating detail or overextended stories that never live up to the promise of the first of the series. “Oryx and Crake”, by Margaret Atwood, is one of my favorite novels of all time, but the second and third books of the trilogy (“The Year of the Flood”, “Maddadam”) are middling science fiction tales, leveraging off the brilliant insights of the first book. Even Lord of the Rings, probably the first ever trilogy and arguably the best, has an awful lot of battles and political intrigue bloating the narrative. If I was to write a sequel to “It’s Always 9/11” it would end up being a war story, and I don’t want to write about war. It’s the lead-up to open conflict that counts.

I hope the characters in “It’s Always 9/11” —Tessa, Larry, Holden, Griffin, Lucille, Teddy, even Rob—resonate and linger in your mind. I hope you imagine their future. But the book ends in a present moment. There are questions, and there are trajectories, but no answers and no resolution. The future is always unknowable, in fiction and in life.